Skip to main content

Skinamarink (2023)


 

Skinamarink is an experimental horror film with two children haunted by an entity.

The film was written and directed by Kyle Edward Ball. He certainly made some odd choices for his experiment. More than ninety percent of the shots were at around a forty-five-degree angle up or down. So you're constantly looking at feet and legs or corners and tops of doors. You never see the entity that is causing all the issues that are going on and that's more of a writing element than it was a directorial choice.

In terms of writing, there is a ton of symbolism. The film plays with the idea that what if the childhood trauma of your parent's divorce was physically manifested. For instance, the doors and windows disappear with an audio clue and a visual blip. The father and mother can't stand to face their children. That phrase could mean that parents have a hard time justifying their selfishness to their children, but also the movie physically has the parents with their backs to them and they don't stand up from the bed. There are more examples but I enjoyed the symbolism throughout since the film isn't traditional.

I would normally talk about the acting but there really wasn't any.

A horror movie is judged by how scary or unnerving it is. It was certainly unnerving but jump scares don't help as audiences have grown to hate cheap jump scares. The film has a handful and two genuinely unnerving moments.

Shudder distributes the movie and I've been a subscriber to their "Horror-only Netflix" for a while now. To be honest it was one of the reasons I went to see the movie.

This film wasn't made for a broad audience and I'd never want to watch it again. Throughout the movie, you're squinting your eyes trying to see what horror elements are there, and for the most part, there's nothing. I look forward to what Ball does next and his writing-directing was the best feature of the film. That being said I can't recommend this film. People were walking out. The film should come with a warning about its experimental nature. It's pretty bad, D+.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leo (2023)

  Leo is about an old lizard who wants to have his one last hurrah before he gets too old to do his bucket list. This is another in the long line of Adam Sandler movies for Netflix that his contract requires him to do. In 2020, Sandler got another quarter of a million dollar deal with Netflix to do four more movies since his view count was so monumental over other Netflix original movies. While watching the movie you can tell it's Sandler's humor and he hires his usual friends to voice act in this animated family film. With Disney failing and Illumination taking hold of families, it's nice that there is room for Happy Madison Productions to put in good work. Sandler  puts on a voice for Leo that is goofy in his own right. Bill Burr plays his best bud Squirtle the turtle.  Cecily Strong, from Saturday Night Live, plays the substitute teacher, she really sells the mean old lady. Another couple of voices you'll recognize were Siendfeld's Jason Alexander as the entitle...

Cinderella (2021)

  Cinderella is a modern take on the classic tale. This time everything is politically upside down. Written and Directed by Kay Cannon,   Cinderella takes any chance it can to push an agenda. It's nauseating in the forcefulness of the propaganda. It's hard to take any scene that isn't singing seriously. It lives in a dystopian world where anyone who doesn't think progressively like-minded is a fool and shouldn't have joy. The direction is okay, but that's to be expected as she probably picked up some being the producer of the Pitch Perfect trillogy. Camila Cabello  plays Cinderella and her first major film. She can sing and performs well next to her stepmother played by Idina Menzel, who needs no introduction. Surely, she will be in future musicals and I can only hope for one with a better writer. Pierce Brosnan  plays King Rowan and is forceful in his performance but given the point of his character, it's sad to see. Someone had to be the punching bag, and ...

Pain Hustlers (2023)

  Pain Hustlers  is a fictional story based on how similarly true events transpire in the pharma business.  From the director of various Harry Potter & Fantastic Beasts  films, David Yates, the film is very different than a typical Yates film. He had a major stinker with The Legend of Tarzan and Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. This is by far his best film. Who knows why but perhaps it's the first time writers Wells Tower and Evan Hughes , both who've basically done nothing. That being said it's a great way to start. Emily Blunt has a hard time with her American accent throughout most of the film, but she does a great job playing the rags-to-riches woman who just wants what's best for her kid. It's relatable and builds on her legacy as an actress.  Chris Evans plays the man who brings Blunt into all of this. He plays a much more interesting character than he has in his previous few Netflix films. I believe he's trying to branch out and show his r...