Skip to main content

The End of Oak Street (2026)


The End of Oak Street starts with Anne Hathaway immediately establishing herself as the film's strongest performer, especially when compared to the wooden performance from Ewan McGregor. The premise of a writer struggling with an unsupportive spouse hits close to home for me. The split-focus direction from David Robert Mitchell isn't particularly new or uniquely executed. Instead, it often feels disorienting without accomplishing what I assume was the intention. Mitchell also struggles with the screenplay, as the dialogue can be atrocious at times and boring the rest of the time. This isn't his first failed attempt at writing interesting characters, which makes it understandable why he hasn't written or directed anything in eight years.

Anne Hathaway is easily the best part of the film. She brings enough personality and emotional weight to keep the movie watchable despite the material surrounding her. Unfortunately, even Hathaway can't carry the entire film. Ewan McGregor is noticeably weak by comparison, making it difficult to invest in their relationship or the central conflict. The male characters are particularly poorly written, with most of them seemingly only capable of talking about women and their beauty during the first third of the film. The exception is P.J. Byrne, who plays a jerk and at least gets enough characterization to make his presence memorable. There's simply very little substance to most of the men in this story.

The effects aren't particularly impressive either. The movie opens with a bunch of flashing lights, while the dinosaurs work best when they're kept out of focus or hidden behind something. It's an understandable way to save money on CGI, but the film should have spent more of its effects budget making the shots where the dinosaurs are actually visible convincing. Even the dog is sometimes CGI, which only makes the limitations more noticeable. It takes about 30 minutes before we finally see a dinosaur, and when it arrives, the effects aren't particularly impressive. 

The 1980s setting feels less like an important part of the story and more like an excuse to insert a stereotypical bully and squeeze in some product placement. The children are ineffective at best and annoying at worst, while much of the action keeps the dinosaurs on the other side of something so you never get a good look at them. I found myself exhausted and simply waiting for the dinosaurs to show up, which isn't a good sign for a dinosaur movie. Anne Hathaway does everything she can to keep the film afloat, but there simply isn't enough here to work with.

Overall, The End of Oak Street is a disappointing creature feature with weak character writing, poor dialogue, underwhelming effects, and a frustratingly slow pace. David Robert Mitchell fails once again to create interesting characters, while the split-focus direction only adds to the film's disorienting presentation. The dinosaurs are rarely shown well enough to be impressive, and the human characters aren't compelling enough to make up for their absence. Anne Hathaway is easily the best part, but she can't carry this film. Result: D+

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Primetime (2026)

Primetime is directed by Lance Oppenheim , who is known for making some other pretentious movies, and unfortunately that reputation feels right at home here. The film offers an interesting look behind the scenes of a television production, but it spends far too much time trying to be artsy and meaningful instead of simply telling its story. Robert Pattinson is easily the best part of the movie. His character is completely Chris Hansen in both voice and mannerisms, which makes his performance unintentionally hilarious at times. Even so, Pattinson fully commits to the role and gives the film some much needed personality. The biggest problem is that the movie never really wraps up his story, making all that investment in his character feel strangely incomplete. Skyler Gisondo gets the unfortunate distinction of being the character we ultimately end on. His character feels like a self-insert, especially with how frequently he brings up the musical Rent . Instead of giving the ending th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Buzzkill (2026)

Buzzkill is a slasher that suffers from overacting, cringe dialogue, and characters who are almost impossible to take seriously. The first victim is supposed to be college-aged, but the actress looks like she is clearly in her thirties, which makes the setup immediately distracting. The movie also constantly makes references that feel like even the actors have no idea what they are actually talking about. It gives the impression that the writers wanted the characters to sound clever without bothering to make their dialogue feel natural. Siena Agudong gives off obvious final girl vibes, and she has the presence to carry that role. The problem is her character is so annoying that it becomes difficult to understand why everyone around her treats her with such reverence. The movie seems determined to convince us that this character is far more likable and important than her actual personality suggests, which makes the character development feel completely backwards. The writing also ends...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Dog Stars (2026)

The Dog Stars is directed by Ridley Scott , which certainly gives the post-apocalyptic film some serious filmmaking pedigree. Unfortunately, the movie starts off very, very slow, taking its time before it really gives the audience much to latch onto. Once it gets going, though, the performances help carry it, particularly the natural charm of its lead. Jacob Elordi brings a lot of charm to the film, which is especially important considering how slow the story develops. His presence gives the movie some much needed vibe and makes it easier to stay invested in the character even when the pacing is dragging. He's continuing to improve his performances even after Frankenstein. Josh Brolin continues to prove that he can make a strong impression in supporting roles. Much like his work in Weapons , he brings a level of confidence and presence that helps elevate the scenes he is in. He may not be the main focus of the movie, but he is one of those actors who can make a supporting role f...
Post a Comment
Read more