Skip to main content

Weapons (2025)

Weapons is written and directed by Zach Cregger, who previously made Barbarian. Here, he delivers his best work yet, creating a film that feels like Pulp Fiction with a horror twist. The nonlinear storytelling, sharp tension, and bold tone make it one of the most unique films in recent years and, for me, the best movie of the year so far.

Julia Garner, fresh off her roles in The Fantastic Four: First Steps and Wolf Man, gives her strongest performance of the year. She brings a layered intensity to her role, balancing fear, cunning, and vulnerability in a way that keeps you glued to her every move.

Josh Brolin is at his most gripping since No Country for Old Men. His presence commands the screen, and he uses his experience to create a menacing yet magnetic performance that elevates every scene he’s in.

Alden Ehrenreich delivers the best performance of his career. He completely disappears into his role, showing a range and charisma that surpasses anything he’s done before, and stands out even among this powerhouse cast. You'll remember that he was Han Solo.

Cregger proves he’s not a one-hit wonder, and Weapons is a tightly crafted, inventive, and confident piece of filmmaking that blends genre and structure masterfully. The ending will make you want to scream "Yes!" at the silver screen. Could this be the second coming of Wes Craven? Result: A

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Bury The Dead (2026)

We Bury The Dead (2026) is a slow burn post apocalypse film centered on grief more than horror. Directed by Zak Hilditch , best known for smaller projects like 1922 and Rattlesnake , this is his first step into a larger American production. You can feel the restraint in the direction, sometimes to the film’s benefit and sometimes to its detriment. The pacing is deliberate, almost stubbornly so, and while the mood is consistent, it rarely escalates into anything memorable. Daisy Ridley , best known for Star Wars: The Force Awakens , carries the film as a woman searching for her missing husband who may or may not have turned into a zombie. Ridley is solid and emotionally grounded, doing the best she can with minimal dialogue and long stretches of quiet reflection. Her performance is never the problem. If anything, she is the primary reason the movie remains watchable. The supporting cast is where the film struggles. Nearly every side character is written as painfully one note, existi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Happy Gilmore 2 (2025)

Happy Gilmore 2 is directed by Kyle Newacheck , known for his work on Workaholics and Murder Mystery . He brings some of that chaotic energy to this sequel, but he’s held back by a script from Tim Herlihy , a frequent Sandler collaborator. Herlihy’s writing feels like it’s trying too hard to be modern, often missing the charm that made the original a cult classic. Adam Sandler has his prime days in the past and his goofy persona is hard to grasp again now that the novelty has worn off. He plays an alcoholic in the film, which was supposed to give him some sort of character arc but it just came across as weak. Julie Brown returns and still brings a grounded energy to the cast. Her chemistry with the rest of the ensemble feels natural, and she’s one of the more consistent performers here despite her minimal use. Christopher McDonald reprises his role as Shooter McGavin, slipping into it effortlessly. He hasn’t lost the smug charisma that made the character iconic, and his presence ad...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anaconda (2025)

Anaconda (2025) is a reboot comedy of the 90s film, written and directed by Tom Gormican , who previously delivered the clever and self-aware The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent . Unfortunately, that lightning does not strike twice. The core problem is simple. The jokes do not land. If horror films are judged by scares per minute, then comedies should be judged by laughs per minute, and this one delivers virtually none. Any humor that works was already burned in the trailer, leaving the film feeling empty and painfully drawn out. Jack Black , known for School of Rock and Jumanji , leans heavily into his loud, chaotic persona, but here it becomes grating rather than charming. His performance feels unchecked and repetitive, as if volume alone is meant to substitute for comedy. Instead of elevating scenes, he often drains them of momentum. Paul Rudd , who audiences know from Ant-Man and I Love You, Man , somehow comes off just as irritating. Rudd is usually likable even in weak m...
Post a Comment
Read more