Skip to main content

Teen Wolf: The Movie (2023)

 



Teen Wolf: The Movie is about werewolves fighting against a firefly demon enemy.

About halfway through the movie, it dawned on me that perhaps this was based on a CW show and when I looked it up I found out it was MTV. The movie is very much written for an audience who has seen the show as many characters and their powers are not introduced. 

Directed by Russell Mulcahy, who also directed the TV show, 1986's Highlander, and more recently the two episodes of Netflix's TV series 13 Reasons Why. I'm not sure what the budget of the film was, but surely they could have spent more on the CGI as it's of the quality of Charmed or Buffy. This is 2023 though, audiences expect better. There are also some camera positions that are questionable and fog also just lingers in specific areas which I suppose is more of a production design issue. The sets are sometimes unbelievable and sometimes the backgrounds are obviously computer generated. The music also swells sometimes then dies down immediately as if it was just there for character reveal.

Will Wallace and Joseph P. Genier are the writers of the show and movie. From only seeing the movie I can tell they lean heavily on sticky dialogue and exposition. The plot is very bizarre and scenes jump from one to another without any flow. I found myself asking my tv "What?" after hearing something really weird that didn't make sense and the movie didn't set up for it. This happened a few times as the movie really just jumps around.

The cast is pretty large. I expect many people to have fan favorites but for a new audience, I felt like it was over-crowded. The worst of the acting came from JR Bourne as half the time he was wooden the other half was overacting and like he was reading a cue card next to the cameraman. The best acting came from Holland Roden, but her character introduction was weird, with bad camera work, and then suddenly she's scribbling on her desk. I remember her from Escape Room: Tournament of Champions but little else. Seth Gilliam is in this movie from The Walking Dead, but here he has one expression. I mean it worked in The Walking Dead but here it just felt boring. His scenes felt like they were one-takes and the director didn't bother to ask them to act better.

The movie is cringy to watch and I doubt I would have enjoyed the TV show after seeing the movie. Roden keeps this movie from being the absolute worst. D-



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tuner (2026)

Tuner is written and directed by Daniel Roher and centers around a piano tuner who becomes involved in cracking safes, balancing his growing criminal life with his personal relationships. The film has a very specific tone that will not work for everyone, but it knows exactly what audience it is aiming for. Roher keeps the story grounded and character-focused, allowing the tension to come more from personal choices and atmosphere than from explosive action. It moves at a deliberate pace, which may lose some viewers, but those willing to settle into its rhythm will likely appreciate what it is doing. Leo Woodall , known for The White Lotus and One Day , plays the lead role and does a strong job carrying the film. He balances the nervousness and charm of the character well, making the transition between ordinary working man and reluctant criminal believable. Woodall gives the film its emotional center and keeps the quieter moments engaging through sheer screen presence. Havana Rose L...

Passenger (2026)

Passenger is directed by André Øvredal , known for The Autopsy of Jane Doe and Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark , with a script by Zachary Donohue and T.W. Burgess . The film centers around a demonic presence tied closely to the title itself, and when it focuses directly on the horror elements, it works surprisingly well. Øvredal still understands how to stage tension and build effective scares, but the material between those moments struggles to stay engaging. The pacing slows considerably whenever the horror steps aside, leaving the film feeling uneven overall. Jacob Scipio , known for Bad Boys for Life and Expend4bles , takes on the boyfriend role but never fully feels like someone the audience naturally roots for. Whether intentional or not, his screen presence lacks the vulnerability or charisma needed to carry the quieter sections of the film. He handles the horror scenes competently enough, but the emotional connection never really forms. Lou Llobell , known for Foundatio...

In the Grey (2026)

In the Grey is written and directed by Guy Ritchie , known for Snatch and The Gentlemen , and the film carries all the style and personality audiences expect from him. The dialogue is sharp, the pacing is confident, and the story constantly moves with a sense of swagger that keeps it entertaining throughout. Ritchie once again proves he knows how to make even familiar action setups feel fresh through his direction and character work. Eiza González , known for Baby Driver and Ambulance , plays the beautiful and manipulative lawyer role perfectly. She brings confidence and charisma to every scene, balancing charm with danger in a way that fits naturally into Ritchie’s world. Beyond just looking the part, she fully commits to the character’s aggressive personality and ends up being one of the film’s strongest presences. Henry Cavill , known for Man of Steel and The Witcher , delivers another very likable performance. His natural charm works extremely well here, especially in the fil...