Skip to main content

V/H/S/85 (2023)


V/H/S/85 is a collection of short horror films like the few before this.

Segment one had a methodical buildup but really lacked scary moments. There were some tense moments with a bit of gore; if that's your cup of tea, then you'll enjoy this one. Also, the character development was better than the second. 

Segment two went from lackluster to crazy really quick. It had a worthwhile ending, although its pacing could have been better. The buildup is more of a rug being pulled under your feet, leaving an overall sour taste in my mouth. 

Segment three starts off preachy, boring, and uninspired. The VR headset looks too modern to be from 1985 because remember Nintendo's Virtual Boy headset from 1995? This one appears more modern than that. The audience in segment three looks as bored as I was watching this. The monster, I won't say what its name is, looks incredibly dumb. Segment three was the worst. 

Segment four had an interesting connection to segment one, but this segment alone could have been made into a feature-length film if they had put more time and thought into it. It was short and lacked a lot of scary moments, it just had a lot of guns and blood.

Segment five had the most gore and intrigue. The characters seem realistic for the setting but were sort of caricatures of how people imagined people in that period would act. The director was Gigi Saul Guerrero which comes as no surprise that she outdoes the rest of the shorts. The best segment goes to a female director as well as the worst with segment three, also a female director. 

I enjoyed V/H/S/85 for what it was. It's another solid anthology film from Shudder. Sure it had a bad segment but it was sandwiched between some good ones. Result: B-.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Night Patrol (2026)

Night Patrol (2026) has flashes of sharp writing mixed with moments that are downright idiotic. When it works, it works surprisingly well, but the inconsistency hurts the overall experience. The CG is especially rough at times and pulls you out of the film more than once. It feels like a movie that knows what it wants to be but cannot fully execute on that vision. Ryan Prows , a V/H/S alumnus best known for his segment in V/H/S/94 and earlier work in the anthology space, directs the film with confidence. His eye for atmosphere and pacing is solid, especially during the quieter moments. Unfortunately, the weaker script moments and uneven effects undermine his direction, even though the film itself is competently staged. Justin Long , recognizable from Jeepers Creepers and Barbarian , is the most noteworthy actor in the cast even though he plays a supporting role. He clearly understands the tone of the film and leans into Fowler’s rise in a way that feels intentional and self aware....
Post a Comment
Read more

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026)

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026) continues the infected saga with a story that is strange enough to stay engaging and familiar enough for longtime fans to settle back in. If you have followed the previous films, there is enough connective tissue here to keep your interest, even when the execution falters. The film leans into cult imagery and bleak world building, which works more often than not, even if the pacing and presentation are uneven. Nia DaCosta , who previously directed Candyman (2021) and The Marvels , shows some recurring issues with camera direction and dialogue-heavy scenes. Several shots are awkwardly staged, and conversations often lack visual energy. That said, the overall Alex Garland's  story structure is solid and appropriately weird for this universe, suggesting stronger material than her technical choices allow to shine. Jack O’Connell , known for Unbroken and Sinners , plays the satanist cult leader and walks a fine line between overacting and cont...
Post a Comment
Read more

Marty Supreme (2025)

Marty Supreme (2025) is written and directed by Josh Safdie , who previously directed Good Time and Uncut Gems . This film carries that same frantic Safdie energy, with constant motion and pressure that rarely lets the audience breathe. It is chaotic by design, sometimes to a fault, but the intensity feels intentional rather than sloppy. Even when the pacing threatens to overwhelm, the film remains compelling due to the strength of its performances. Timothée Chalamet , known for Dune and Call Me by Your Name , plays the title role and fits it perfectly. He fully commits to the character’s ambition and volatility, balancing confidence with insecurity in a way that feels natural for him at this stage of his career. This is not a transformative performance, but it is a highly effective one, and he clearly understands the rhythm and demands of a Safdie-style film. Odessa A’zion , who audiences may recognize from Grand Army and Hellraiser (2022) , is a standout as the love interest. S...
Post a Comment
Read more