Skip to main content

V/H/S/85 (2023)


V/H/S/85 is a collection of short horror films like the few before this.

Segment one had a methodical buildup but really lacked scary moments. There were some tense moments with a bit of gore; if that's your cup of tea, then you'll enjoy this one. Also, the character development was better than the second. 

Segment two went from lackluster to crazy really quick. It had a worthwhile ending, although its pacing could have been better. The buildup is more of a rug being pulled under your feet, leaving an overall sour taste in my mouth. 

Segment three starts off preachy, boring, and uninspired. The VR headset looks too modern to be from 1985 because remember Nintendo's Virtual Boy headset from 1995? This one appears more modern than that. The audience in segment three looks as bored as I was watching this. The monster, I won't say what its name is, looks incredibly dumb. Segment three was the worst. 

Segment four had an interesting connection to segment one, but this segment alone could have been made into a feature-length film if they had put more time and thought into it. It was short and lacked a lot of scary moments, it just had a lot of guns and blood.

Segment five had the most gore and intrigue. The characters seem realistic for the setting but were sort of caricatures of how people imagined people in that period would act. The director was Gigi Saul Guerrero which comes as no surprise that she outdoes the rest of the shorts. The best segment goes to a female director as well as the worst with segment three, also a female director. 

I enjoyed V/H/S/85 for what it was. It's another solid anthology film from Shudder. Sure it had a bad segment but it was sandwiched between some good ones. Result: B-.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026)

The Devil Wears Prada 2 is written by Aline Brosh McKenna , known for The Devil Wears Prada and Cruella , and continues the story with a noticeably different tone. The film leans heavily into a more modern studio approach, with its themes and messaging pushed front and center. Structurally, it falls into a repetitive pattern of “problem, solution, move on,” creating a chain of predictable moments that feel more like checkpoints than a natural progression. The result is a story that lacks subtlety and rarely trusts the audience to engage without being guided at every turn. Meryl Streep , known for The Iron Lady and Kramer vs. Kramer , returns as Miranda Priestly and once again delivers a commanding performance. She slips back into the role effortlessly, bringing the same sharp presence and control that defined the original. Even when the material around her falters, she remains consistently engaging and reminds you why the character worked so well to begin with. Anne Hathaway , kno...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hokum (2026)

Hokum is written and directed by Damian Mc Carthy , known for Oddity , and continues his focus on atmospheric, slow-building horror. The film leans heavily into unease and isolation, crafting a setting that feels both grounded and unsettling. McCarthy shows a clear confidence in tone, allowing the horror to develop naturally rather than relying on constant shocks. The result is a film that delivers on both terror and atmosphere, even if it takes its time getting there. Adam Scott , known for Parks and Recreation and Step Brothers , plays a writer who is intentionally difficult to like for much of the film. His character comes across as abrasive early on, which creates a bit of distance between him and the audience. However, as the story unfolds, the writing shifts that perception, giving him more depth and making it easier to root for him as things spiral. Scott handles that transition well, gradually pulling the audience back onto his side. David Wilmot , known for Fantastic Beast...
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael (2026)

Michael is directed by Antoine Fuqua , known for Training Day and The Equalizer 2 , and this film clearly carries his stylistic fingerprints. It aims to capture the life and legacy of Michael Jackson through a more personal lens, balancing spectacle with intimate character moments. While Fuqua brings a strong visual identity and some powerful sequences, the film struggles with pacing. The editing feels bloated at times, with certain stretches lingering longer than they should, which disrupts the overall flow. Jaafar Jackson , making his debut and known primarily for being the nephew of Michael Jackson , takes on the monumental task of portraying his late uncle. He does an impressive job embodying both the physicality and presence, capturing the voice, movement, and charisma in a way that feels authentic rather than imitative. It is a performance that carries the film and makes it easy to stay invested even when the structure falters. Colman Domingo , known for Rustin and Euphoria...
Post a Comment
Read more