The Strangers: Prey at Night

The Strangers: Prey at Night is the follow up to the 2008 film The Strangers. The premise is pretty much the same except it's at a mobile home park and it's a family of four.

Bryan Bertino did the original and wrote this follow up's screenplay. The dialogue and structure of the film is very 80s horror and throws in a lot of tropes that audiences have come to expect. It's formulaic and predictable if you're an adult. This film is rated R but for some reason, the kills that were used throughout the film were generally muted. Sure there's blood but I left the theater thinking that I saw a PG-13 film.

Johannes Roberts has improved since doing 47 meters down. Don't ask me why that film got a sequel. This man loves his horror films and it shows. There are some camera and editing problems but nothing too major. He used the zoom function of the camera so much in the film. There are parts where I could see intent on how he chose the shot and then others seem random. Randomness is a theme to the film so I suppose there's a connection there.

I wish there was more Christina Hendricks, not just because she was in one of my favorite movies of all time, Drive, but because she can act really well and I felt she was just briefly in the film even though she's credited first.

Daughter of Christina Hendricks was the wonderful Bailee Madison who you'll recognize from the television show Good Witch or The Fosters. I believe, maybe foolishly, but I believe that there was intent on how Kinsey emoted at the beginning of the film. I suppose I should say lack thereof. There is a bigger character arc if at the beginning there are little expressions on an actress's face so that when there's horror there's a drastic change in how the audience sees her. She nails the horror queen, Laurie Strode, scream, and whimpering.

The bigger problems with the acting come from the two males in the film. They were stereotypic with underdeveloped characters and poorly written excuses to separate the family from each other. The choices they make are a roller coaster of fickleness.

I disagree with some of the critics on just how bad of a film most believe it was. It's not that bad. Sure the final scenes are an eye roller and the first ten minutes aren't all that interesting, but I enjoyed the hunt and horror the rest of the film provided. I didn't like it as much as the first but I think Bailee Madison carried the film pretty well.

Result: C (The Ritual is a better choice and you don't have to leave home to watch that horror film.)

Comments

Scream 7

Scream 7 (2026) marks the return of Kevin Williamson , the original writer of Scream , now stepping back in to write and direct. The result is a sequel that feels closer in spirit to the franchise’s roots. It balances meta commentary with straightforward slasher brutality and, for the most part, it works. Neve Campbell returns as Sidney Prescott and immediately grounds the film. Her presence alone gives the story weight, and the script wisely centers her instead of sidelining her. There are a few cameos from figures in Sidney’s past that longtime fans will appreciate, and while some feel more nostalgic than necessary, they never fully derail the pacing. Also, she's not past her prime. Isabel May , known for 1883 and Alexa & Katie , steps into a major role and holds her own as Sidney's daughter. She brings a modern energy without feeling like a forced replacement, and her dynamic with Campbell adds tension that feels organic rather than manufactured. The violence is tu...

Dracula (2026)

Dracula (2026) is written and directed by Luc Besson , and it feels like a filmmaker trying to modernize a classic myth while chasing a younger audience. The film is hyperactive in its editing, filled with quick cuts that rarely let a scene breathe. It is hard not to compare that to the more confident pacing of The Fifth Element , which trusted its style and performances to carry attention without frantic cutting. Here, the editing feels almost desperate at times. Caleb Landry Jones takes on the title role and uses a very odd accent that feels like a deliberate directorial choice. He also leans heavily into overacting, pushing expressions and line delivery to theatrical extremes. In Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri , he was more subdued and forgettable in a supporting role. Here he is front and center, and the performance is certainly memorable, just not always in a good way. Christoph Waltz plays the priest positioned as the protagonist. As expected, he brings his tradem...

Crime 101 (2026)

Crime 101 (2026) is a crime thriller that checks the basic boxes of what should work, but the writing never tightens enough to make it compelling. It hits familiar beats, runs longer than it should, and never quite earns its tension. It feels like a good movie outline stretched into a full runtime. Bart Layton , known for American Animals and The Imposter , directs, and his uneven filmography shows here. The structure is serviceable, but the pacing drags and the scenes lack urgency. The direction is competent without being memorable, and the film never finds a sharp identity. Chris Hemsworth , known for Thor and Extraction , plays the reclusive criminal at the center of the story. He tries to lean into a quieter, more internal performance, but he does not fully sell the damaged foster child mentality the script is aiming for. The performance feels like an attempt rather than a transformation. Mark Ruffalo , recognized for Spotlight and The Avengers , feels like he is on autopilo...

Movies, Film, and Chili

Search This Blog