The Strangers: Prey at Night

The Strangers: Prey at Night is the follow up to the 2008 film The Strangers. The premise is pretty much the same except it's at a mobile home park and it's a family of four.

Bryan Bertino did the original and wrote this follow up's screenplay. The dialogue and structure of the film is very 80s horror and throws in a lot of tropes that audiences have come to expect. It's formulaic and predictable if you're an adult. This film is rated R but for some reason, the kills that were used throughout the film were generally muted. Sure there's blood but I left the theater thinking that I saw a PG-13 film.

Johannes Roberts has improved since doing 47 meters down. Don't ask me why that film got a sequel. This man loves his horror films and it shows. There are some camera and editing problems but nothing too major. He used the zoom function of the camera so much in the film. There are parts where I could see intent on how he chose the shot and then others seem random. Randomness is a theme to the film so I suppose there's a connection there.

I wish there was more Christina Hendricks, not just because she was in one of my favorite movies of all time, Drive, but because she can act really well and I felt she was just briefly in the film even though she's credited first.

Daughter of Christina Hendricks was the wonderful Bailee Madison who you'll recognize from the television show Good Witch or The Fosters. I believe, maybe foolishly, but I believe that there was intent on how Kinsey emoted at the beginning of the film. I suppose I should say lack thereof. There is a bigger character arc if at the beginning there are little expressions on an actress's face so that when there's horror there's a drastic change in how the audience sees her. She nails the horror queen, Laurie Strode, scream, and whimpering.

The bigger problems with the acting come from the two males in the film. They were stereotypic with underdeveloped characters and poorly written excuses to separate the family from each other. The choices they make are a roller coaster of fickleness.

I disagree with some of the critics on just how bad of a film most believe it was. It's not that bad. Sure the final scenes are an eye roller and the first ten minutes aren't all that interesting, but I enjoyed the hunt and horror the rest of the film provided. I didn't like it as much as the first but I think Bailee Madison carried the film pretty well.

Result: C (The Ritual is a better choice and you don't have to leave home to watch that horror film.)

Comments

Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die (2026)

Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die is directed by Gore Verbinski and written by Matthew Robinson , who clearly has never been in a classroom. He writes students and teachers through the lens of what social media portrays them as rather than how they actually behave. The movie is trying to build character development, but it's clear within the first five seconds who these people are. Instead of letting the plot move forward, the movie spends way too much time developing characters that didn't need nearly that much development. As a teacher, I found myself rolling my eyes, both metaphorically and literally, more times than I could count. The message is front and center throughout the movie, and no amount of talent can really distract from the bad writing. It isn't until around the twenty-minute mark that the movie finally gets back to the actual plot. By that point, the unnecessary character development and side stories have already dragged things down. The movie clearly wa...

Return to Silent Hill (2026)

Return to Silent Hill is written and directed by Christophe Gans , who also directed the original Silent Hill and, oddly enough, the French Beauty and the Beast . Unfortunately, the film has problems almost immediately, with questionable directorial choices that make it difficult to get fully invested. It is obvious that Gans has a great deal of respect for the source material, and there are moments where that appreciation comes through, but respecting the game and adapting it effectively are two different things. The film often feels too concerned with recreating what was already there rather than figuring out what works best for a movie. Jeremy Irvine , known for War Horse and Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again , plays the iconic James Sunderland and unfortunately struggles with the performance. He goes over the top in several scenes, and some of his line deliveries are so unnatural that I found myself wondering why they were not simply redone. James is supposed to be an emotionally com...

Practical Magic 2 (2026)

Practical Magic 2 is directed by Susanne Bier , who previously worked with Sandra Bullock on Bird Box . The film brings back the Owens sisters, with Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman returning. Sally is still the more grounded and tightly wound of the two, while Gillian remains a little more aloof and unpredictable. Unfortunately, the movie struggles with pacing, and there are several moments where the suspension of disbelief starts to wear thin. Sandra Bullock returns as Sally and continues to fit naturally into the role. Sally's more serious personality provides a good contrast to Gillian, and Bullock still has the presence to make the character enjoyable to watch. Her chemistry with Nicole Kidman remains one of the more important parts of the movie, especially because the two sisters have such different personalities. Nicole Kidman returns as Gillian, bringing the same more carefree and aloof personality that separates her from Sally. Kidman seems comfortable stepping back...

Movies, Film, and Chili

Search This Blog